Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714995›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Understanding the roles and experiences of mental health peer support workers in England: a qualitative interview study.

Ruth E Cooper, Natasha Lyons, Stephen Jeffreys, Tamar Jeynes, Vicky Nicholls, Una Foye, Prisha Shah, Lizzie Mitchell, Karen Machin, Beverley Chipp and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ruth E CooperNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. ruth.1.cooper@kcl.ac.uk.
Natasha Lyons *NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Stephen JeffreysNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Tamar JeynesNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Vicky NichollsNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Una FoyeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Prisha ShahNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Lizzie MitchellNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Karen MachinNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Beverley ChippNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew GrundyNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health (MHPRU) Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Tamara PemovskaNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Nafiso AhmedNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca AppletonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Julie RepperImROC (Implementing Recovery Through Organisational Change), ImROC Head Office, Nottingham, UK.
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Alan SimpsonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeer support roles in mental health services are significantly increasing in the United Kingdom and internationally. However, there is wide variation in these roles and limited research exploring the ways in which Peer Support Workers (PSWs) are currently working. We aimed to explore: 1) the values underpinning the PSW role; 2) the distinctive features of the work that PSWs’ do; and 3) the perceived impact of the PSW role.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with paid mental health PSWs working across a range of settings. We took a co-produced, participatory approach: interviews were carried out by researchers with lived experience of mental health conditions and data were analysed using collaborative methods, guided by general principles of thematic analysis.

resultsWe interviewed 35 PSWs. Overarching themes identified from iterative analysis included: 1) Underpinning values: (i) Recovery is possible: fostering hope, role-modelling and encouraging change, (ii) Mutuality: sharing lived experiences to bring empathy and build connection, (iii) Person-centred approach: adapting ways of working to the individual, (iv) Empowering instead of ‘fixing’ service users. 2) Distinctive features: The centrality of an individualised approach, facilitating recovery through sharing lived experiences and building connection. PSWs advocated for service-user needs and most worked in non-clinical ways, offering holistic, recovery-orientated support. Tensions could arise with more clinical approaches. 3) Impacts: Participants thought that peer support helped service users feel understood, leading to greater openness and facilitating recovery, although some felt that it may not be right for everyone. The role had benefits for participants’ own recovery, although its emotional demands could lead to burnout. Participants felt that PSWs could bring systemic improvements to services and use their lived experience to help teams meet service user needs.

conclusionPSWs work in a range of ways, but, a unifying feature is a flexible, person-centred approach, facilitating recovery through shared lived experience. A range of potential benefits of peer work were identified for PSWs and for service users, as well as reports of positive systemic change. These could be facilitated by recovery-orientated models in services, space for shared learning with PSWs, and flexibility to incorporate PSWs’ unique ways of working. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchPeer supportPeer workersQualitative

Identifiers

PMID41714995
PMCPMC13032312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.