ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
A national survey of dementia diagnosis and care in English memory services.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn England, National Health Service (NHS) memory services provide most dementia diagnostic and immediate post-diagnostic care. We aimed to co-design and conduct a survey regarding diagnostic and post-diagnostic care, and perceived readiness for new treatments.
methodsWe invited all memory services in England to complete the survey. We compared services by provider type, investigating whether service characteristics (provider type, rurality, region, referral rates, staffing mix, accreditation) were associated with diagnosis rates and psychological therapy provision.
results139/188 (73.9%) memory services participated, 130 (93.5%) provided by mental health/community and 9 (6.5%) by acute trusts. We estimated that English memory services receive 192,418 referrals/year, 98.7% to mental health/community trust services. In these services, the median annual referral rate per Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff was 100.8 (Interquartile range: 56.7-132.8). Of FTE memory service staff, 14.0% (9.0-19.0%) were doctors. Acute trust-based services reported fewer referrals (45.8, 21.1-99.5) and had more doctors (33.0%, 23.0-43.0% FTE). More acute trust services felt ready to prescribe dementia Disease Modifying Treatments (N = 8 [88.9%]) than mental health/community services (N = 50, [41.7%]), while fewer acute trusts offered post-diagnostic psychological therapy routinely (N = 5 [55.6%]) vs. (N = 100 [77.5%]) in community services. NHS region (β = 0.70 [95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.08, 1.32]) and rurality (β = 2.14, [95% CI: 1.32, 2.96]) predicted lower diagnostic rates; regions with highest dementia diagnosis rates (67%+) had more memory service staff relative to the local aged 65 + population size.
conclusionWe identified marked geographical inequalities. People in regions with less resourced memory services and rural areas had less access to timely diagnosis and care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.