Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714932›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

ColonyQuant: automated quantification and morphometric analysis of pluripotent stem cell colonies.

Rui Geng, Benjamin L Kidder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rui GengDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Benjamin L KidderDepartment of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. benjamin.kidder@wayne.edu.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative image analysis is essential for advancing stem cell biology, developmental studies, and drug discovery, yet most workflows still rely on manual or semi-quantitative scoring that is slow, subjective, and poorly scalable. A major challenge is converting complex colony morphologies into reproducible, high-dimensional datasets. To address this gap, we developed ColonyQuant, an open-source platform that integrates automated colony segmentation, alkaline phosphatase (AP) intensity quantification, morphometric profiling, and statistical classification into a single workflow. ColonyQuant computes per-colony functional readouts alongside comprehensive shape descriptors, capturing both staining intensity and structural features in a unified framework. Applied to embryonic stem cells (ESCs) treated with a selective KDM4 histone-demethylase inhibitor, ColonyQuant revealed dose-dependent reductions in colony area and integrated AP signal, together with systematic remodeling of morphometric metrics. Multivariate analyses robustly stratified treatment groups and identified intensity and solidity as principal features capturing dose-dependent colony responses. By transforming subjective scoring into objective, scalable, and biologically interpretable phenotyping, ColonyQuant provides a reproducible platform for stem cell research and high-content screening.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPluripotent Stem CellsSoftwareAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsEmbryonic Stem CellsMiceAlkaline PhosphataseAlkaline phosphatase stainingAutomated image analysisColony morphologyEmbryonic stem cellsHigh-content screeningImage analysisMachine learningMorphometric profilingPhenotypic heterogeneityPluripotencyQuantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID41714932
PMCPMC13020171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.