Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714917›Full record

ArticleCurrent organic synthesis2025

Comparison Between Solid Catalysis and Electrochemical Catalysis in the Synthesis of Methyl Carbamate

Seba Nassif, Rasha Alabbas, Ahmade Alassaf, Omar Alkhuder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current organic synthesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seba NassifDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Al Baath University, Homs, Syria.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-7587
Rasha AlabbasDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Al Baath University, Homs, Syria.
Ahmade AlassafDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Al Baath University, Homs, Syria.
Omar AlkhuderDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Al Baath University, Homs, Syria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHofmann rearrangement reactions are important organic reactions used to obtain carbamates, which are formed via isocyanate as an intermediate compound. Since carbamates have applications in various fields, such as pharmaceuticals, agricultural chemistry, and herbicides, this research focuses on synthesizing carbamates using environmentally friendly methods like solid catalysts and electrical techniques due to their unique characteristics in enhancing selectivity and minimizing solvents. Additionally, a comparison between the two methods was made. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this study, two methods were employed to obtain carbamate. The first method utilized heterogeneous catalysis with sodium halide-modified aluminum oxide to achieve a high basic surface area alongside sodium hypochlorite as a safe and inexpensive oxidant. The second method employs electrochemical catalysis using a carbon anode and a zinc cathode, with sodium halides serving as intermediates.

resultsSodium chloride modified with aluminum oxide demonstrated better results than sodium bromide and iodide. A higher yield of carbamates was obtained in a shorter time and at moderate temperatures. In contrast, in the electrochemical method, sodium bromide demonstrated the best performance, achieving 75% conversion under ambient conditions.

conclusionThe comparison between the two methods revealed that the electrochemical method significantly outperformed, as it managed to avoid side products and directed the reaction towards the target compound under mild conditions. Whereas the solid catalytic method (Al2O3/NaCl) obtained lower yields and produced side products in a shorter reaction time.

Indexed as

benzamideelectrochemical catalysisHoffman rearrangementniacinamidesodium halide.solid catalysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.