Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714805›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2026

What does BCL-2 do? From new molecular insights to the clinical implications.

Carlo M Croce, Stephen W G Tait, Ana J Garcia-Sáez, Andreas Villunger, Anthony Letai, Harriet S Walter, Martin J S Dyer, Douglas R Green, Yufang Shi, Gerry Melino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlo M CroceDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Carlo.Croce@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3788-1457
Stephen W G TaitCancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, UK. Stephen.Tait@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-132X
Ana J Garcia-SáezMax Planck Institute of Biophysics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. ana.garcia@biophys.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-5945
Andreas VillungerInstitute for Developmental Immunology, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. andreas.villunger@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-4153
Anthony LetaiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. anthony_letai@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1993-9013
Harriet S WalterThe Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Department of Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. hw191@le.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-711X
Martin J S DyerThe Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Department of Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. mjsd1@le.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-2236
Douglas R GreenDepartment of Immunology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. douglas.green@stjude.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-1417
Yufang ShiThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Institutes for Translational Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Suzhou Medical College Soochow University, Suzhou, China. yfshi@suda.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-319X
Gerry MelinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. melino@uniroma2.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-5972

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (Italian Association for Cancer Research) IG 2022 ID 27366Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) P36658, I5311, FG25, and I6642EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) AdG 787171 (POLICE)Ministero della Salute (Ministry of Health, Italy) PNC-E3-2022-23683266Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca (Ministry of Education, University and Research) PE00000019National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32150710523, 81930085 and 82202032Suzhou University of Science and Technology SYS2020087, ZXL2021440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It took decades from the discovery of BCL-2, initially identified in chromosomal translocations associated with lymphoid malignancies, to understand how BCL-2 and its family members regulate apoptosis, launching a transformative journey in cancer biology often called "the road to ruin". Developing powerful BCL-2 inhibitors for clinical use required decades. Yet, this remains as one of the most successful achievements in a field that started ~40 years ago, as recounted by its pioneers. BCL-2 was later found to inhibit apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), a breakthrough that clarified its role in cancer pathogenesis. Such effects of BCL-2 on MOMP prevent cytochrome c release and caspase activation, while its family members-anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g. BCL-2, BCL-XL) and pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g. BAX, BAK, BH3-only proteins)-orchestrate a delicate balance in cell death regulation. MicroRNAs like miR-15/16, often deleted in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), modulate BCL-2 expression, driving oncogenesis. Mechanistically, BAX/BAK oligomerization forms mitochondrial pores, with sublethal MOMP triggering inflammation via cGAS-STING and NF-κB pathways. Alternative MOMP inducers (e.g. BOK) and mitochondrial dynamics further refine apoptotic control. Clinically, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has revolutionized CLL and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment, showing efficacy in TP53-mutant CLL and elderly AML patients when combined with CD20 antibodies or hypomethylating agents. However, resistance, driven by BCL-2 mutations (e.g. Gly101Val) or MCL-1 upregulation, poses challenges. Limited success in solid tumors underscores the complexity of BCL-2 family dependencies. Future directions include novel inhibitors targeting MCL-1 or BCL-XL, BH3 profiling for precision therapy, and combinations with immune or DNA repair modulators. Non-apoptotic roles of BCL-2 in metabolism also warrant exploration. This review highlights the clinical success of BCL-2 inhibitors, addresses resistance mechanisms, and explores future directions, including sublethal MOMP, inflammatory outcomes, and novel inhibitors. Celebrating the collaborative, interdisciplinary efforts that transformed fundamental discoveries into life-saving therapies, this account underscores both the triumphs and the "potholes" encountered on the path to understanding apoptosis, while identifying open questions for ongoing research.

Indexed as

Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2AnimalsApoptosisHumansMicroRNAsMitochondrial MembranesMicroRNAsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2

Identifiers

PMID41714805
PMCPMC13076788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.