ArticleScientific reports2026
AI prediction models based on time-lapse imaging for good embryos with implantation potential and euploidy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Approaches Towards the Optimization of Embryo Implantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Embryo Selection: Current Approaches and Clinical Implications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embryo selection in assisted reproduction has traditionally relied on subjective morphological grading, which is prone to inter-observer variability and correlates poorly with ploidy, the primary cause of miscarriage. Artificial intelligence (AI) models utilizing time-lapse imaging have emerged; however, many rely on human-defined morphokinetic markers or static blastocyst images. We developed two deep learning models that non-invasively predict the likelihood of clinical pregnancy and embryo ploidy status, based solely on time-lapse videos and maternal age. In this retrospective study, 2,436 embryos were analyzed for pregnancy prediction and 1,645 for ploidy prediction, with external validation performed using data from independent IVF centers. Both models were implemented using a spatiotemporal convolutional neural network. The pregnancy prediction model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.799 in the validation set, 0.717 in the internal test set, and 0.746 in the external test set. The ploidy prediction model yielded AUROCs of 0.802, 0.738, and 0.759 in the validation, internal, and external test sets, respectively. These results suggest that AI models can serve as non-invasive decision support tools that leverage developmental dynamics associated with implantation potential and chromosomal status. These models may supplement conventional morphology-based assessment and contribute to more objective embryo selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.