ArticleCommunications medicine2026
A machine learning model for frailty based on wearable device measurements.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From frailty-driven to frailty-informed care in the age of wearable AI.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Predictive Risk Models for Frailty Onset in Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Methodological Trends, Model Performance, and Clinical Translation Gap.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is an important factor in human aging associated with a broad range of adverse outcomes. Frailty metrics are time intensive to collect making them difficult for larger scale application.
methodsWe apply machine learning to predict these frailty metrics, associated risk factors, and adverse outcomes from activity data. We use activity data collected using Actigraphy wearable accelerometer sensors, which are devices that measure acceleration along three axes of movement. Models were evaluated using Area Under the receiver operator Curve (AUC), Area Under Precision Recall Curve (AUPRC), Spearman rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Kruskal-Wallis test on repeated subsampling of train and test sets. All statistical tests are reported using -log
resultsMachine learning models show strong predictive performance even with small amounts of accelerometry data available. They are also able to better determine adverse outcomes such as hospitalization and mortality than frailty metrics themselves in our geriatric population.
conclusionsThis approach of wearable activity data-based prediction of frailty offers a surrogate (proxy or estimate) for determining frailty metrics in a scalable manner. It can also be used to determine adverse outcomes such as hospitalizations and mortality, allowing frailty to be used as a metric in other studies or medical practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.