ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatial and temporal dynamics in the use of urban habitats by Hooded Crows.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the habitat use of animals in cities is relevant for urban planning, human-wildlife conflict management and urban biodiversity conservation. We studied the habitat use of Hooded Crows, a nuisance bird in much of Europe, in 16 different neighborhoods (sections) of a recently crow-colonized city in E Hungary. In the breeding season, when crows defend territories, crow numbers increased with nesting site availability and the number of trashbins but were unaffected by habitat type or area of the section. However, colonization probability was negatively influenced by the number of trashbins and restaurants, was high in parks, sports complexes, and quieter residential areas, and was low in residential areas busy with traffic. Outside the breeding season, when crows move around in groups, crow numbers increased with time in the section with the highest number of trashbins, decreased in residential areas and was stable in parks and sports complexes. Our results suggest that while crows are attracted by the foraging opportunities offered by anthropogenic food sources, they avoid nesting in such areas, likely due to high human disturbance. This implies that residential areas with fewer food sources will attract fewer crows, potentially reducing human-crow conflicts. Our study also suggests that improved waste management, such as closed-top trashbins in public places or covered enclosures in zoos, may further reduce the availability of anthropogenic food sources to crows and that targeted crow control is best scheduled for the breeding season and in residential areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.