Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714767›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Learning from multiple readings for axial spondyloarthritis classification of the sacroiliac joints.

Amir Jamaludin, Rhydian Windsor, Sarim Ather, Gregory Ligozio, Aimee Readie, Pedro M Machado, Timor Kadir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amir JamaludinVisual Geometry Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. amirj@robots.ox.ac.uk.
Rhydian WindsorVisual Geometry Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarim AtherOxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Gregory LigozioNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, USA.
Aimee ReadieNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, USA.
Pedro M MachadoDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Timor KadirPlexalis, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T028572/1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Oxford BDI-Novartis Collaboration for AI in Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a cornerstone in the evaluation and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), a chronic inflammatory condition primarily affecting the sacroiliac joints (SIJs), spine, entheses, and peripheral joints. Accurate quantification of axSpA-related changes on MRI is critical for effective research and patient management; however, current lesion detection and grading approaches suffer from substantial intra- and inter-reader variability, limiting their consistency and reliability. To address these challenges, we propose a fully automated machine learning system for SIJ delineation and lesion classification on coronal MRI. The end-to-end pipeline automatically extracts SIJ contours using a vector-field—based open-contour model and classifies the presence or absence of five lesion types (bone marrow oedema, ankylosis, sclerosis, erosions, and fatty lesions) using both T1-weighted and STIR sequences. A multi-reader learning framework is employed to explicitly model inter- and intra-reader variability by leveraging multiple readings and consensus labels. Model performance was evaluated using patient-wise cross-validation on data from the MEASURE-1 clinical trial and further validated on other clinical datasets (PREVENT, SURPASS). Lesion classification performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, while contouring accuracy was quantified using root-mean-square error, where we found that 95% of the whole test set had errors below 2.76mm. The proposed approach achieved AUCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.99 across the five lesion types, with the highest performance observed when using consensus-based labels, and results were comparable to expert inter-reader agreement. These findings demonstrate that fully automated SIJ delineation and lesion scoring can achieve expert-level performance and have the potential to reduce reader burden and variability in large-scale axSpA MRI studies.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliac JointFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsAnkylosing spondylitisMRISacroiliac jointSpine

Identifiers

PMID41714767
PMCPMC13018539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.