Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting cardiopulmonary exercise testing outcomes in congenital heart disease through multimodal data integration and geometric learning.

Muhammet Alkan, Gruschen Veldtman, Fani Deligianni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammet AlkanSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Gruschen VeldtmanGolden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Fani DeligianniSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. fani.deligianni@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences NGR1/1678EPSRC EP/W01212X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a comprehensive assessment of functional capacity by measuring key physiological variables including oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]), carbon dioxide production ([Formula: see text]), and pulmonary ventilation (VE) during exercise. Previous research has identified peak [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ratio as robust predictors of mortality risk in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients as well as in congenital heart disease (CHD). This study utilises CPET variables as surrogate mortality endpoints for patients with CHD. To our knowledge, this represents the first successful implementation of an advanced machine learning approach that predicts CPET outcomes by integrating electrocardiograms (ECGs) with information derived from clinical letters. Our methodology began with extracting unstructured patient information from clinical letters using natural language processing techniques, organising this data into a structured database. We then digitised ECGs to obtain quantifiable waveforms and established comprehensive data linkages. The core innovation of our approach lies in exploiting the Riemannian geometric properties of covariance matrices derived from both 12-lead ECGs and clinical text data to develop robust regression and classification models. Through extensive ablation studies, we demonstrated that the integration of ECG signals with clinical documentation, enhanced by covariance augmentation techniques in Riemannian space, consistently produced superior predictive performance compared to conventional approaches.

Indexed as

Exercise TestHeart Defects, CongenitalMachine LearningAdultElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionAugmentationCHDCovarianceCPETECGFusionRiemannian space

Identifiers

PMID41714742
PMCPMC13018615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.