Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714698›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

TrustNet: a lightweight network with integrated uncertainty quantification and quantitative explainable AI for ischemic stroke detection in CT images.

Mahesh Anil Inamdar, Anjan Gudigar, U Raghavendra, Aryaman Kaprekar, Massimo Salvi, Silvia Seoni, Girish R Menon, Filippo Molinari, U R Acharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mahesh Anil InamdarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Anjan GudigarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. anjan.gudigar@manipal.edu.
U RaghavendraManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Aryaman KaprekarManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Massimo SalviBiolab, PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Turin, 10129, Italy.
Silvia SeoniBiolab, PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Turin, 10129, Italy.
Girish R MenonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Filippo MolinariBiolab, PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Turin, 10129, Italy.
U R AcharyaSchool of Mathematics, Physics, and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, 4300, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing ischemic stroke from computed tomography (CT) images is a highly challenging and detailed process that requires precise and careful analysis by a medical professional. Deep learning techniques offer an effective solution to this issue because of their remarkable performance. Nevertheless, most of those methods still lack the uncertainty quantification (UQ) and eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) features, which are essential for clinical practice and acceptance. We present TrustNet, a small but powerful convolutional neural network that uses Monte Carlo dropout and quantitative Grad-CAM. This technique helps visualize the issues related to two independent factors: uncertainty in the model’s classification and inconsistency in recognizing the relevant visual features. The model was validated on a set of 2023 brain CT scans and compared with networks that are generally used for classification purposes. TrustNet was able to achieve an accuracy of 94.67%, with 100% specificity, 91.6% sensitivity, and 100% precision, competing against various conventional architectures. The introduction of the UQ and XAI methods led to a consistent performance enhancement over the baseline models by limiting the number incorrect predictions, which is crucial for stroke diagnosis. With this performance, our approach can also provide an explanation for the reasoning and estimate confidence, which is essential for model deployment. This method is an indispensable tool for eliminating diagnostic bias and thus controlling the safety of AI in the clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIschemic StrokeTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerUncertaintyDeep learningeXplainable AIIschemic stroke detectionMonte Carlo dropoutUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID41714698
PMCPMC13018592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.