Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Hierarchical malware detection, family identification, and variant attribution using CNN-based hybrid models on grayscale executable images.

Maheep Saxena, Tanurup Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maheep SaxenaThe West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, 700106, India.
Tanurup DasThe West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata, 700106, India. tanurupdas@nujs.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malware has become more challenging to trace as attackers use obfuscation, polymorphism, and automated generation of very similar variants. As a result, security software must not only be able to detect malicious files but also detect their larger families and more specific variants to facilitate effective analysis and correlation. In this paper, we present a three-level deep learning architecture for malware and benign file detection, malware family classification, and subfamily assignment based solely on grayscale images extracted from Windows PE executable files. Each file is statically and dynamically analyzed and then represented as a normalized 224 × 224 grayscale image. The labelled dataset consists of benign samples, the five most prevalent malware families, and 33 subfamilies. We compare the performance of three CNN-based hybrid models under a common multi-output framework: CNN with a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) head, CNN with a Capsule Network (CapsNet) block, and CNN with a Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) layer. A single forward pass yields predictions for all levels of the classification hierarchy. Experimental outcomes indicate that CNN + TCN reaches 99% binary accuracy, 98% family accuracy, and 94% subfamily accuracy, while CNN+CapsNet reaches 100%, 97%, and 93%, and CNN+BiLSTM reaches 100%, 98%, and 94%, respectively.

Indexed as

33 malware subfamiliesCNN+BiLSTMCNN+CapsNetCNN + TCNGrayscale imageMalware classificationPE filesStatic and dynamic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41714694
PMCPMC13022366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.