ArticleScientific reports2026
Integration of intragraft transcriptomics and urinary cytokines identifies CXCL10 and FasL signature in subclinical acute rejection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations ofBiomedicines · 2026Article
- The chemokine network in lupus nephritis: pathogenesis, targeted therapies, and future directions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) in kidney transplantation, defined by histologic lesions without clinical dysfunction, remains a major cause of allograft injury and is currently detectable only by invasive protocol biopsies. We conducted a multicenter study in which transcriptomic profiling of Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded biopsies from SCAR and control patients revealed a distinct signature with upregulation of NFKBIZ, TNFSF14, SLAMF8, and CD247, validated by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry but not detectable in urine. Focusing on secreted cytokines, CXCL10 and FasL emerged as candidate urinary biomarkers and were first measured in 12 SCAR patients and 12 controls, showing a significant increase in SCAR. Validation in an independent cohort of 86 kidney transplant recipients, after excluding patients with confounders, confirmed higher CXCL10 and FasL levels in SCAR. When combined as a composite biomarker signature (CXCL10 + FasL), ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.711 (95% CI, 0.549–0.874), with 50% sensitivity and 84% specificity at the optimal cutoff. In the still poorly studied context of SCAR, this work is a proof-of-concept approach linking intragraft transcriptomics to urinary cytokine levels. Our findings support the utility of urinary CXCL10 and FasL in assisting clinicians in identifying patients who may benefit from further evaluation, including consideration of a graft biopsy, thereby contributing to improved long-term allograft outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.