ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
Evaluation of the effectiveness of social mobilization for vaccination among healthcare and non-healthcare workers in emergency situations.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emergency vaccination programs face unique challenges requiring effective social mobilization strategies, yet comprehensive evaluations of mobilization effectiveness across population settings and temporal phases remain limited. This cross-sectional study conducted from September 2024 to January 2025 included 3048 healthcare workers and 3722 non-healthcare workers in China using multi-stage stratified sampling across eastern, central, and western regions. Participants retrospectively evaluated vaccination attitudes across three COVID-19 vaccination phases: pre-mobilization (2020), in-mobilization (2021-2022), and post-mobilization (2023). Healthcare workers showed increased vaccination willingness in-mobilization (53.5% to 56.2%, p < 0.05), while non-healthcare workers demonstrated sustained increases from 45.1% to 48.1% and 46.5% (p < 0.05). In-mobilization, collective responsibility remained the strongest predictor for healthcare workers (OR = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.85-3.89), while social identity emerged for non-healthcare workers (OR = 3.24, 95% CI: 2.10-4.99). These findings suggest that association between social mobilization and vaccination willingness depends on population-specific intervention strategies acknowledging distinct motivational frameworks and temporal dynamics in emergency vaccination contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.