SynthesisScientific reports2026
Effects of astaxanthin supplementation on human sperm quality during the freeze thaw process: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of antioxidants in cryopreservation media has been shown to improve post-thaw sperm quality and male fertility in several credible meta-analyses. However, to our knowledge, no review has specifically examined the impact of astaxanthin, a potent antioxidant, on sperm quality after freezing. This meta-analysis and systematic review aims to investigate how astaxanthin affects sperm parameters during the freeze-thaw process. A thorough search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) was conducted up until July 1, 2024. Random-effects models were used to synthesize the data, and the quality and heterogeneity of the evidence were assessed. Our findings show that while astaxanthin improved sperm viability and morphology, there was no significant improvement in total motility (MD = 5.67, 95% CI: -7.49 to 18.84, p = 0.40) or DNA damage (MD = -12.07, 95% CI: -25.72 to 1.57, p = 0.08) after thawing. However, significant increases were observed in progressive motility (MD = 6.79, 95% CI: 3.37 to 10.21, p = 0.00) and sperm viability during thawing (MD = 7.56, 95% CI: 4.91 to 10.21, p = 0.00). Astaxanthin also significantly improved the percentage of sperm with normal morphology (MD = -24.53, 95% CI: -45.25 to -3.81, p = 0.02). Additionally, sperm kinematic parameters including VAP (MD = 3.71, 95% CI: 0.65 to 6.77, p = 0.02) and VCL (MD = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.19 to 5.54, p = 0.00) were significantly improved, while no significant differences were observed for VSL, LIN, and STR.A descriptive synthesis of redox status, metabolic activity, MMP measures, and apoptosis was conducted.These findings suggest that astaxanthin supplementation can significantly improve sperm viability, morphology, and certain kinematic parameters during the freeze-thaw process. However, due to the small sample sizes, risk of bias, and significant heterogeneity, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.