Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable machine learning for optimized dimethyl ether production from bio-methanol.

Mohsen Mokari, Mohammad Rahmani, Saeid Atashrouz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohsen MokariChemical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad RahmaniChemical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. m.rahmani@aut.ac.ir.
Saeid AtashrouzChemical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid models often referred to as gray-box models offer a promising approach by combining the flexibility of data-driven techniques with the accuracy and physical interpretability of first-principles models. This study evaluates a range of mathematical modeling techniques in the context of chemical reaction engineering, with a focus on the production of dimethyl ether (DME) from bio-methanol in a fixed-bed reactor. A comprehensive case study was conducted, beginning with the development of a first-principles model to solve a system of governing equations and generate 7,000 synthetic data points with added noise. Three black-box machine learning algorithms, including K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were employed for predictive modeling. In parallel, hybrid modeling approaches were developed to estimate reaction rates and correct reactor outputs. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as mean squared error (MSE) and the coefficient of determination (R2), using key variables including the inlet molar flow rate, initial temperature, pressure, and the outlet concentrations of methanol, dimethyl ether, and water, as well as overall conversion. Results indicated that the data-driven models performed exceptionally well, with hybrid models offering comparable accuracy while maintaining interpretability. Finally, process optimization was performed using the Extreme Gradient Boosting model integrated with a Differential Evolution algorithm. The optimized operational conditions achieved a high dimethyl ether conversion rate of 84.3%, with a minimal temperature rise of 84.9 K.

Indexed as

Differential evolutionHybrid modelingLong short-term memoryMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41714657
PMCPMC13018583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.