Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714590›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026

Finding the forest in the trees: Using machine learning and online cognitive and perceptual measures to predict adult autism diagnosis.

Erik Van der Burg, Robert M Jertberg, Hilde M Geurts, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Sander Begeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik Van der Burg *Section Clinical Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Netherlands and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-7925
Robert M Jertberg *Section Clinical Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Netherlands and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jertbergiii@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4077-9077
Hilde M GeurtsDutch Autism and ADHD research Center (d'Arc), Brain & Cognition, Department of Psychology, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bhismadev ChakrabartiCentre for Autism, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. b.chakrabarti@reading.ac.uk.
Sander BegeerSection Clinical Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Netherlands and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional subjective measures are limited in the insight they provide into underlying behavioral differences associated with autism and, accordingly, their ability to predict diagnosis. Performance-based measures offer an attractive alternative, being designed to capture neuropsychological constructs more directly and objectively. However, due to the heterogeneity of autism, differences in any one specific neuropsychological domain are inconsistently detected. Meanwhile, protracted wait times for diagnostic interviews delay access to care, highlighting the importance of developing better methods for identifying individuals likely to be autistic and understanding the associated behavioral differences. We administered a battery of online tasks measuring multisensory perception, emotion recognition, and executive function to a large group of autistic and non-autistic adults. We then used machine learning to classify participants and reveal which factors from the resulting dataset were most predictive of diagnosis. Not only were these measures able to predict autism in a late-diagnosed population known to be particularly difficult to identify, their combination with the most popular screening questionnaire enhanced its predictive accuracy (reaching 92% together). This indicates that performance-based measures may be a promising means of predicting autism, providing complementary information to existing screening questionnaires. Many variables in which significant group differences were not detected had predictive value in combination, suggesting complex latent relationships associated with autism. Machine learning's ability to harness these connections and pinpoint the most crucial features for prediction could allow optimization of a screening tool that offers a unique marriage of predictive accuracy and accessibility.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderMachine LearningAdultExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Learning ModelsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41714590
PMCPMC12966452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.