ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of genetic testing in inborn errors of immunity: lessons from a large Turkish cohort.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are inherited disorders with heterogeneous clinical, immunological, and genetic features; genetic testing is now indispensable for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield, inheritance patterns, and clinical impact of genetic testing on IEIs at a tertiary care center in Turkey over a 10-year period. This retrospective cohort included 1407 patients diagnosed with or followed for IEI between 2010 and 2020 at Ankara University Faculty of Medicine. Clinical, immunologic, and molecular data were analyzed to assess subgroup distribution, genetic testing methods, turnaround times, and the influence of genetic results on diagnosis and treatment. Predominantly antibody deficiencies were the most common IEI subgroup (67.8%), followed by combined T- and B-cell immunodeficiencies (12.2%). Parental consanguinity was present in 32.1% of patients. Genetic testing was performed in 417 patients (29.6%), and pathogenic variants were identified in 325 (77.9% of the tested population), involving 94 different genes. Most variants exhibited autosomal recessive inheritance (71.4%). The diagnostic yield was 66.8% for targeted gene panels and 68.4% for whole-exome sequencing. Turnaround times markedly decreased from 28.1 months in 2010 to 2.3 months in 2020. Genetic findings led to diagnostic or therapeutic modifications in 20.6% of patients, primarily through disease reclassification or personalized treatment adjustments.
conclusionComprehensive clinical and immunological evaluations remain fundamental to accurate genotypic characterization of patients with IEI. To ensure timely and precise diagnosis, genetic analyses should be initiated early and conducted through close collaboration between clinical immunologists and genetic specialists. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Inborn errors of immunity are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders that often require molecular confirmation for accurate diagnosis. • Genetic testing supports individualized management when integrated with detailed clinical and immunological evaluation. WHAT IS NEW: • In this 10-year, large national cohort from Turkey, clinically guided genetic testing achieved a high diagnostic yield and identified pathogenic variants in the majority of tested patients. • Genetic results led to diagnostic or therapeutic modifications in approximately one-fifth of cases, emphasizing the importance of early, coordinated collaboration between clinical immunologists and genetic specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41714534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.