Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714522›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

A case report and literature review of multiple complications in the treatment of an aneurysm with the woven endobridge device.

Yifeng Lin, Zhenyu Xiao, Peng Zhang

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yifeng LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No.149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, P.R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-1549
Zhenyu XiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No.149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, P.R. China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No.149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, P.R. China. seve_zp@zmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-5659

Funding

Zunyi Municipal Bureau of Industry and Science and Technology ZSKHHZZ2024179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is proven safe and effective for wide-neck aneurysms in GCP trials; simultaneous intra-operative complications have not been reported. CASE

introductionA 47-year-old man presented with sudden headache; CTA/DSA revealed a ruptured basilar aneurysm, SAH and moyamoya disease. WEB embolisation was planned. An incomplete aneurysm coverage required semi-deployment of a stent-assisted coil, followed by full stent deployment that pushed the WEB into the sac. Micro-thrombi on the WEB protrusion reduced posterior cerebral flow, which was reversed promptly with antiplatelet therapy. Post-op recovery was uneventful; no neurological deficits. DISCUSSION: WEB remains safe for wide-neck aneurysms, yet device sizing, release angle and irregular morphology heighten risk. Prolonged manipulation may provoke thrombosis and ischaemia; meticulous technique and rapid antiplatelet rescue are essential.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyHumansMaleMiddle AgedStentsCerebral aneurysmEmbolizationEndovascularSubarachnoid

Identifiers

PMID41714522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.