ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2026
Androgenetic Alopecia in Women: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Treatments.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with androgenetic alopecia: an analysis of current evidence.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) affects nearly 50% of women during their lifetime, representing the most prevalent form of chronic hair loss in this population. Despite its high incidence, AGA in women remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, with significant psychosocial consequences including diminished self-esteem, impaired social functioning, and reduced quality of life that often exceed impacts observed in men. AGA pathophysiology involves complex interactions between hormonal, genetic, and environmental factors. Androgens promote follicular miniaturization through progressive shortening of the anagen phase, while estrogens may provide protective effects. Genetic studies reveal sex-specific differences in disease mechanisms, and environmental factors like oxidative stress and pollution may contribute to disease progression. Clinical evaluation requires careful consideration of differential diagnoses including chronic telogen effluvium, diffuse alopecia areata, and scarring alopecias. Diagnostic tools include trichoscopy, pull testing, and trichometric measurements to assess hair density and miniaturization patterns. Currently, topical minoxidil is the only FDA-approved treatment for female AGA, also referred to as female pattern hair loss (FPHL). Off-label therapies include low-dose oral minoxidil, anti-androgens such as spironolactone and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (finasteride and dutasteride), and hair transplantation. Adjunctive treatments like low-level light therapy and platelet-rich plasma may further augment improvement and are often best used in conjunction with medical therapies. Critical research gaps persist, including the paucity of randomized controlled trials for AGA that include female patients. There is an urgent need for additional FDA-approved therapies for AGA in women to increase treatment access and reduce its psychosocial burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41714473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.