ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Pharmacogenomics of antiepileptic drug mood stabilizer treatment response in bipolar disorder: A MoStGen Consortium study.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antipsychotic use in bipolar disorder: clinical and genomic correlates- a Mayo clinic bipolar disorder biobank study.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Antipsychotic Use in Bipolar Disorder: Clinical and Genomic Correlates- A Mayo Clinic Bipolar Disorder Biobank Study.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying biological and clinical factors associated with response to mood-stabilizing medications is critical for improving bipolar disorder (BD) treatment. The Mood Stabilizer Genomics (MoStGen) Consortium was established to investigate pharmacogenomic and clinical predictors of response to treatment of BD with antiepileptic drug mood stabilizers (AMS). Here we present the first pharmacogenomic analyses of AMS treatment outcomes based on MoStGen Consortium data, including 917 individuals across contributing sites. We performed genome-wide association analyses in subcohorts followed by meta-analyses, with AMS treatment response measured quantitatively using the Alda scale. Medication-stratified analyses were performed for valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) treatment response. Additionally, polygenic score (PGS) analyses were used to evaluate the overall genetic contribution to AMS response across cohorts and to test whether genetic liability for various neuropsychiatric illnesses impacts AMS response. We detected genome-wide significant associations with LTG treatment response for SNPs in the gene ROBO2 (top SNP: rs985123, p = 1.9E-10) and for POLR1E at the gene-level (p = 2.53E-06). No significant associations were found for overall AMS or VPA treatment response. Leave-one-out PGS analyses provided significant evidence for a polygenic signal for AMS treatment response. Furthermore, the epilepsy PGS was nominally significantly associated with AMS response (p = 0.024), suggesting higher genetic liability to epilepsy predicts a better response to treatment with AMS. These findings provide insights into the genetic contribution to AMS treatment outcomes, and in particular LTG response, and may contribute to the development of more precise treatments for BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.