Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714432›Full record

Observational studyCerebellum (London, England)2026

Minimal Important Change of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the Modified Functional SARA (f-SARA) in Patient with Subacute Infratentorial Stroke: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

Shota Yoshikawa, Akiyoshi Matsugi, Shogo Fukumoto, Kozo Ueta, Taisuke Nakayama, Kenichi Shimazaki, Yutaka Kikuchi, Tomonori Yamada, Kazuya Matsuda, Kazuhiro Miyata

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cerebellum (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shota YoshikawaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Sakurakai Hospital, 5-2610-1 Handa, Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, 589-0011, Japan. s8t4y6k3@gmail.com.
Akiyoshi MatsugiFaculty of Rehabilitation, Shijonawate Gakuen University, 5-11-10, Hojo, Daitou-shi, Osaka, Japan.
Shogo FukumotoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Japan Community Healthcare Organization (JCHO), Hoshigaoka Medical Center, 4-8-1 Hoshigaoka, Hirakata-shi, Osaka, 573-0013, Japan.
Kozo UetaDepartment of Rehabilitation, JCHO Yamatokoriyama Hospital, 1-62 Asahi-machi, Yamatokoriyama-shi, Nara, 639-1013, Japan.
Taisuke NakayamaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels Mihara Memorial Hospital, 366 Ota-machi, Isesaki-shi, 372-0006, Japan.
Kenichi ShimazakiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels Mihara Memorial Hospital, 366 Ota-machi, Isesaki-shi, 372-0006, Japan.
Yutaka KikuchiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels Mihara Memorial Hospital, 366 Ota-machi, Isesaki-shi, 372-0006, Japan.
Tomonori YamadaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Tesseikai Neurosurgical Hospital, 28-1 Nakanohonmachi, Shijonawate-shi, 575-8511, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuya MatsudaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Yao Municipal Hospital, 1-3-1 Ryuge-cho, Yao-shi Osaka, 581-0069, Japan.
Kazuhiro MiyataDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Science, 4669-2 Ami, Ami-machi, Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0394, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter prospective longitudinal study aimed to estimate the minimal important change (MIC) for the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the modified functional SARA (f-SARA) in patients with subacute infratentorial stroke and ataxia undergoing rehabilitation. The study was conducted at inpatient rehabilitation units across five neurosurgical hospitals and included eighty patients with subacute infratentorial stroke. The SARA, f-SARA, and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) were assessed at baseline (within three months of onset) and at follow-up (two and four weeks after baseline). Additionally, the Global Rating of Change (GRC) scale was used by both participants and therapists to assess subjective improvement in ataxia prior to the 2- and 4-week follow-ups. Patients were divided into two groups based on improvements in BBS (≥ 7 points) or GRC (≥ 5 points). MIC was calculated using a receiver operating characteristic-based method when the correlation between SARA/f-SARA change scores and the external anchors (BBS or GRC) was ≥ 0.3. The results showed that MICs for SARA and f-SARA could not be established using patient- or therapist-rated GRC. When the BBS served as the external anchor, the MIC for SARA was − 2.75 points at 2 weeks and − 4.75 points at 4 weeks. For f-SARA, the MIC was − 1.5 points at 2 weeks and − 2.5 to − 3.25 points at 4 weeks. In conclusion, the MIC values calculated in this study provide a useful benchmark for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for ataxia and may guide clinical decision-making regarding intervention selection.

Indexed as

AtaxiaSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStroke RehabilitationMinimal important changeModified functional scale for the assessment and rating of ataxiaScale for the assessment and rating of ataxiaStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.