Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714397›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An interdisciplinary machine learning-based approach for predicting corn grain yield under biofertilizer applications.

Mohsen Jahan, Mehdi Nassiri-Mahallati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohsen JahanDepartment of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), P.O. Box 9177948978, Mashhad, Iran. jahan@ferdowsi.um.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-5124
Mehdi Nassiri-MahallatiDepartment of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), P.O. Box 9177948978, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-1733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting grain yield is a critical aspect of agriculture that assists farmers and planners in managing resources more efficiently and enhancing productivity. This study investigates and compares eight machine learning algorithms for predicting corn grain yield (Zea mays L.) using 73 plant and soil features, including 32 primary features and 41 engineered interaction features. Experiments were conducted over two years at the research farm of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, and the data were processed using random splitting (70% training, 15% validation, 15% testing) and standardization (StandardScaler). Initially, a stepwise backward regression model identified 13 key features (e.g., Canopy Temp_3, % P plant) with an adjusted R2 of 58.53%. Subsequently, among fifteen common algorithms, ANFIS, Transformer, ANN, SVR, LightGBM, XGBoost, Enhanced DNN, and SVM were shortlisted and evaluated. Metrics including R2, RMSE, MAE, and Willmott’s d indicated that ANFIS (R2 = 0.555), Transformer (R2 = 0.545), and ANN (R2 = 0.518) performed best, while SVM (R2 = 0.325) was the weakest. SHAP plots and Decision Plots revealed that interactions such as Leaf Area Index_Dry Matter Yield and Canopy Temp_4 play a key role in prediction. Correlation analysis identified two main clusters (physiological and yield-related), and the skewed data distributions confirmed the necessity for nonlinear models. Results demonstrated that neural network models (especially those with Attention mechanisms and TensorFlow) better model complex ecophysiological relationships. Features like canopy temperature and the interaction between plant nitrogen content and root colonization percentage were identified as primary variables, highlighting the importance of nutrient uptake and plant physiological responses. This study showed that combining interaction features with advanced machine learning algorithms can, on one hand, improve prediction accuracy and contribute to enhancing crop production system efficiency toward sustainable agriculture goals, and on the other hand, provide the foundation for precision agronomic management, identification of effective ecophysiological pathways in final yield formation, and adaptation to climate change.

Indexed as

Edible GrainFertilizersMachine LearningZea maysAgricultureAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsSoilFertilizersSoilArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiEcophysiological interactionsFeature engineeringInput efficiencyModel validationPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID41714397
PMCPMC13018282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.