ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-assisted diagnosis of cervical dysplasia from cervicography images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervicography using Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) is widely adopted for cervical cancer screening in low-resource settings. Although effective for identifying visible lesions, VIA cannot determine the severity of dysplasia, limiting its diagnostic utility. This study proposes a multi-task learning framework combined with an ensemble mechanism to estimate lesion severity directly from cervicography images. Four clinically relevant features—color, surface texture, lesion position, and lesion area across quadrants—learned through deep learning model and aggregated using ensemble method resulting a severity decision. Five datasets were used across training, testing, and prediction stages; Swede Score annotations supported model training, while histopathology-confirmed images from IARC were used for validation to ensure reliable ground truth. To address data scarcity, StyleGAN-2 with adaptive discriminator augmentation (ADA) was employed to generate synthetic images for augmentation. Initial multi-task learning experiments achieved 62% accuracy. After applying GAN-based augmentation and ensemble learning, performance improved substantially, reaching 95.21% accuracy, 95.08% sensitivity, and 81.25% precision for mild cases, and above 95% across all metrics for severe cases. Despite these promising results, the study has several limitations, including dataset imbalance, reliance on synthetic GAN-generated images, variability in imaging modalities across datasets, and a relatively small test set. These factors may affect the model’s generalizability in broader clinical applications. Overall, the findings highlight the potential of the proposed approach to enhance the diagnostic value of VIA-based cervicography, while underscoring the need for larger datasets and more extensive clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.