Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714364›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrated life cycle assessment and multicriteria decision making framework for evaluating renewable energy technologies at Istanbul Airport.

Ayça Zenginoğlu, Fatma Şeyma Yüksel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayça ZenginoğluTechnology Transfer Office Coordinatorship, Aksaray University, 68100, Aksaray, Türkiye.
Fatma Şeyma YükselDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Adıyaman University, 02040, Adıyaman, Türkiye. fyuksel@adiyaman.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an integrated decision-support framework for the multidimensional assessment of renewable energy technologies in large-scale airport terminals. We propose a hybrid approach that integrates quantitative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) results with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) to support strategic energy planning. Given their high energy demand and operational complexity, airports are critical hubs for sustainability research. Our framework combines LCA, the CRITIC method, and expert-based AHP to evaluate seven energy technologies across environmental, economic, social, and technical dimensions. Environmental indicators from the LCA were objectively weighted via CRITIC, while other criteria were assessed through AHP. These insights were then integrated using the MULTIMOORA model to determine global sustainability performance. Using Istanbul Airport as a realistic case study, our findings reveal that technologies focused on energy management and electrification offer superior environmental performance due to operational efficiencies. While geothermal systems excel in heating and cooling, PV, wind, and biomass technologies show more pronounced impacts within their supply chains. Ultimately, this research provides a scalable and methodologically robust framework for assessing renewable energy applications at the airport scale.

Indexed as

AHPCRITICLife cycle assessmentMULTIMOORARenewable energy technologySustainable airport

Identifiers

PMID41714364
PMCPMC13018293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.