ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of repeated freeze and thaw cycles on the stability of faecal microbiome composition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reanalysing previously collected samples to address new research questions offers a time-efficient alternative to initiating new cohort studies. However, concerns remain regarding the stability of the faecal microbiome following repeated freeze-thaw (FT) cycles, which may introduce bias in downstream analyses. To this end, we investigated the effect repeated FT cycles had on 16 S rRNA gene sequencing and its ability to accurately measure the gut microbiome composition consistently. Our analysis showed that inter-individual sample differences consistently outweighed any effects introduced by FT. Differential abundance analysis with MaAsLin2 identified a limited number of significantly altered microbial genera after the first FT, when compared to the fresh, unfrozen material. The following second and third FT cycles showed no significant changes compared to the first FT cycle. Subsequent cycles (four to six) showed minor but progressive shifts in specific taxa. However, analysis with the more conservative method ALDEx2 showed no significant changes across any FT cycle. These findings support the reuse of stored faecal samples that have undergone a single thaw, suggesting minimal risk of compromising microbiome integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.