ArticleScientific reports2026
Household perspectives and predictors of human-carnivore conflict in Nepal's Annapurna Conservation Area.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its inception in 1986, Nepal's Annapurna Conservation Area (ACA) has made significant strides as one of the world's first Integrative Conservation Development Projects, balancing community needs, development, and conservation. In this time, attitudes among residents towards carnivores such as snow leopards Panthera uncia have improved dramatically. Despite this, carnivore depredation of livestock continues to threaten local agropastoral livelihoods, creating tensions between residents and the ACA. In this study, we reassess the drivers of community perceptions of human-carnivore conflict through semi-structured interviews with residents, key informants, and focus group discussions. Analyzed through ordinal logistic models and qualitative examination, our 2025 survey responses reflect sustained improvements in community attitudes toward snow leopards since initial studies in 1994, while perceptions of wolves Canis Lupis remain overwhelmingly negative. The key driver of perceptions of snow leopards is the growth of the tourism industry as an alternative income source, in addition to education and gender. Perceptions of conservation actors are mixed, with an overall belief that local bodies represent pastoralist interests better than ACA upper management, with the livestock compensation scheme as a key source of tension. Our findings will inform future conservation policy that addresses human-wildlife conflict among shifts in human livelihoods, demographic shifts, and climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.