ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based battery health prediction for enhancing electric vehicle performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable and sustainable battery diagnostics are essential for advancing electric vehicle (EV) technologies and fulfilling Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7): Affordable and Clean Energy. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning framework that integrates one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1D-CNNs), Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers, along with an attention mechanism, for intelligent EV battery health diagnostics. Differential Voltage (dV/dQ), Differential Current (dI/dV), and Incremental Capacity Analysis (ICA, dQ/dV) features were extracted and denoised from over 10,000 charge-discharge cycles sourced from the NASA PCoE, Oxford, and CALCE battery degradation datasets. The proposed model achieved a State-of-Health (SOH) prediction accuracy of [Formula: see text] and RMSE = 0.021, outperforming conventional CNN, LSTM, and XGBoost baselines by up to 25% in accuracy. With only 0.35 million parameters, the model demonstrated an average inference latency of 6.1 ms and energy consumption of 0.63 mJ per sample-a 27% reduction compared to Transformer-based architectures. These results confirm the framework's robustness, scalability, and real-time feasibility for embedded Battery Management Systems (BMS). By improving diagnostic precision, extending battery lifespan, and reducing computational energy demand, the proposed method directly contributes to sustainable mobility and the broader goals of energy efficiency and the circular economy under SDG 7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.