ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of real-time source apportionment approaches in six Chinese cities using the AXA (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) instrumental set-up.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates an innovative system that can be used for Near Real-Time Source Apportionment (NRT model) providing results within minutes after the measurements across six Chinese cities: Beijing, Langfang, Shijiazhuang, Xi'an, Wuhan, and Chongqing during 2020-22. The system leverages the AXA instrumental setup (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) to integrate high-time-resolution data and provide detailed insights into major particulate matter (PM) sources and their contributions. Secondary PM components dominated across all sites, accounting for up to 66% of the total PM2.5 mass in some cities. Primary sources such as solid fuel combustion contributed approximately 10-30%, while episodic dust events were a major source in Langfang during specific periods. The system's performance was validated by strong correlations (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.