Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41714180›Full record

Observational studyUnited European gastroenterology journal2026

Asymptomatic Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis: A Prospective Study of Natural Course and Risk Factors for Intervention.

Sidharth Harindranath, Sridhar Sundram, Biswa Ranjan Patra, Aditya Kale, Ankita Singh, Suprabhat Giri, Arun Vaidya, Aniruddha Phadke, Akash Shukla

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sidharth HarindranathDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6024-7959
Sridhar SundramDepartment of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Biswa Ranjan PatraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8548-8329
Aditya KaleDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6925-0214
Ankita SinghDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Suprabhat GiriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Arun VaidyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Aniruddha PhadkeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Akash ShuklaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWalled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), a complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis, presents management challenges, especially when asymptomatic. While current guidelines advocate conservative management for asymptomatic WOPN, the natural history of these collections remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the natural history of asymptomatic WOPN and identify predictors of symptom development or complications necessitating intervention.

methodsThis prospective observational study included consecutive adult patients with asymptomatic WOPN (those tolerating oral nutrition with minimal or no abdominal pain, without infection, pressure symptoms, or GI bleeding) diagnosed via contrast-enhanced CT or MRI from September 2021 to October 2023. Data on demographics, etiology, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patients were followed for 12 months with monthly assessments for the first 6 months and then every 3 months. MRI abdomen was performed at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients developing symptoms/complications during follow-up requiring intervention.

resultsOf the 54 patients, 32 (59.2%) developed complications requiring intervention [infection (n = 12), refractory pain (n = 10), obstructive jaundice (n = 2), intracystic hemorrhage (n = 2) and spontaneous rupture (n = 6)]. There was one death (1.9%) secondary to hemorrhage from a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm. Twenty-two patients (40.7%) remained asymptomatic. Interventions included endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage (n = 22), percutaneous drainage (n = 8), and surgical necrosectomy (n = 2). The mean size of WOPN at baseline was significantly higher in patients requiring intervention (9.28 vs. 6.01 cm, p = 0.003). A WOPN size greater than 5.6 cm predicted the need for intervention with 88.5% sensitivity and 54% specificity. Multivariable logistic regression identified WOPN size as an independent predictor of intervention (OR 1.2, p = 0.011).

conclusionA significant proportion of patients with asymptomatic WOPN require interventions within 12 months. WOPN size is a key predictor of symptom development and intervention.

Indexed as

Pancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingAdultAgedAsymptomatic DiseasesDisease ProgressionDrainageFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPancreasProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41714180
PMCPMC12920042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.