Observational studyContact dermatitis2026
Clinical Factors Associated With Current Relevance in Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Development of Predictive Models Based on Data From the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Register (REIDAC).
Observational study in Contact dermatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent relevance of positive patch-test reactions guides management in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), yet its clinical predictors and the use of predictive models in clinical practice remain underused.
objectivesTo identify demographic and clinical factors associated with current relevance in ACD and to develop overall and allergen-specific predictive models.
methodsA multicentric REIDAC study included data from patch-tested patients with the Spanish baseline series. Exposure history, anatomical sites, atopic status, and occupational data were recorded. Logistic regression (LR) models were trained and internally validated to predict current relevance overall and for top frequent allergens. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsAmong 17 005 patients, 4077 (24.0%) had at least one currently relevant reaction. The final overall LR model achieved an AUC for the validation sample of 0.679. Allergen-specific AUC parameters (LR) varied among allergens but performed best for nickel (AUC = 0.770). The independent factors associated with current relevance were female gender, specific body sites (hand, neck, head, leg, feet) and two occupations (hairdresser and construction workers). The use of other models (LASSO, gradient boosting) revealed similar results.
conclusionsPrediction modelling may moderately predict current relevance in ACD and several clinical variables are associated with current relevance in ACD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.