ArticleTuberculosis and respiratory diseases2026
Challenges and Controversies in Perioperative Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: An Optimistic Perspective.
Article in Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), extending their role from metastatic to resectable disease. While neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapies have each shown clinical value, recent evidence suggests that a perioperative strategy-incorporating both preoperative and postoperative immune-based treatment-may provide more consistent and durable survival benefits, especially in stage IIIA and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-expressing tumors. Despite concerns about feasibility and immune-related adverse events, phase III trials such as CheckMate 816, KEYNOTE-671, and AEGEAN have demonstrated that perioperative chemoimmunotherapy is both effective and tolerable in real-world practice. This review examines the rationale, clinical trial data, patient selection criteria, and safety profile of perioperative immunotherapy, and argues for its increasing adoption as a strategic standard in eligible NSCLC patients. Additionally, emerging biomarkers and circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease surveillance hold promise for refining precision of perioperative treatment. Taken together, the evidence supports perioperative immunotherapy as a forward-looking, evidence-based approach to improving outcomes in resectable NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.