Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41713473›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2026

MRI-based personalisation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy duration in HER2-positive early breast cancer (TRAIN-3): primary results from a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.

Fleur M Louis, Anna van der Voort, Mette S van Ramshorst, Antonios Daletzakis, Ingrid A Mandjes, Inge Kemper, Mariette J Agterof, Wim A van der Steeg, Joan B Heijns, Marlies L van Bekkum and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. MRI-guided de-escalation in HER2-positive early breast cancer: precision progress with necessary prudence.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Fleur M LouisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anna van der VoortDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mette S van RamshorstDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Antonios DaletzakisDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ingrid A MandjesDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Inge KemperDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mariette J AgterofDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
Wim A van der SteegDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands.
Joan B HeijnsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands.
Marlies L van BekkumDepartment of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands.
Ester J M SiemerinkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands.
Philomeen M KuijerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Netherlands.
Astrid ScholtenDepartment of Radiation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDivision of Molecular Pathology and Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mees D EgelerDepartment of Psychosocial Research, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lonneke V van de Poll-FranseDepartment of Psychosocial Research, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: g.sonke@nki.nl.
Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group (BOOG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant treatment comprising six to nine cycles of anti-HER2 based chemotherapy yields high pathological complete response rates and excellent survival outcomes in patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer but comes with noteworthy side-effects. The TRAIN-3 study investigated if patients treated with this regimen who have a rapid complete radiological response on MRI are candidates for early surgery. The study showed that one-third of patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours and one-sixth of patients with hormone receptor-positive tumours had a pathological complete response after only three cycles of chemotherapy. Here, we report the results of the primary endpoint, 3-year event-free survival.

methodsTRAIN-3 is a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study conducted across 43 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer aged 18 years or older and with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. Patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel (80 mg/m

findingsBetween April 1, 2019, and May 12, 2021, 235 patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours and 232 with hormone receptor-positive tumours were enrolled. All participants, except one, were female. Median follow-up was 40·1 months (IQR 35·3-45·6). 3-year event-free survival was 92·2% (95% CI 88·7-95·9) in patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours and 92·0% (88·5-95·6) in patients with hormone receptor-positive tumours. In total, 40 (9%) patients had experienced an event (19 [8%] patients in the hormone receptor-negative group and 21 [9%] in the hormone receptor-positive group). 3-year event-free survival rates among patients treated with one to three cycles were 96·1% (95% CI 91·8-100) in the hormone receptor-negative group and 98·6% (95·8-100) in the hormone receptor-positive group. Event-free survival rates for patients receiving four to six cycles were 89·2% (82·4-96·6) and 94·2% (88·8-99·9), and for those receiving seven to nine cycles, 90·6% (83·8-98·1) and 85·4% (78·3-93·1%), respectively. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (187 [40%] of 467), anaemia (82 [18%]), diarrhoea (60 [13%]), thrombocytopenia (46 [10%]), and hypokalaemia (35 [7%]), and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 56 (12%) patients. The frequency of grade 3-4 adverse events and grade 2 or worse neuropathy increased with the increasing number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

interpretationMRI-guided optimisation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy duration was associated with favourable 3-year event-free survival outcomes in patients with stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer. This approach represents a novel strategy that reduces treatment burden, minimises toxicity, and preserves quality of life in a subset of patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer.

fundingRoche Netherlands.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarboplatinChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPaclitaxelAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCarboplatinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPaclitaxelpertuzumabTrastuzumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.