Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41713030›Full record

GuidelineCancer research and treatment2026

Korean Practical Guidelines for Geriatric Assessment and Management of Older Adults with Cancer: A Korean Cancer Association Guideline for Geriatric Oncology.

Minsu Kang, Jeonghyun Kang, Changhoon Song, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hong Chung, Ilhak Lee, Jae Hung Jung, Jae Hyun Jeon, Eunjin Jeong, Jeong Rim Koh and 17 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Minsu Kang *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Jeonghyun Kang *Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Changhoon SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Heung-Kwon OhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Hong ChungDepartment of Urology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Ilhak LeeDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Hung JungDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Jae Hyun JeonDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Eunjin JeongDepartment of Family Medicine, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Rim KohDepartment of Nursing, Andong Science College, Andong, Korea.
Jung Hye KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung- Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea.
Jung-Yeon ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Kidong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Kwangmin KimInstitute of Evidence-Based Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Kyung Hyun MoonDepartment of Urology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Minkyu JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Se Jin HongCollege of Nursing, Research Institute of AI and Nursing Science, Gachon University, Incheon, Korea.
Su-Jin KohDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
Sukki ChoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Suzy KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yun-Gyoo LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Miyoung ChoiDivision of Healthcare Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Ah ParkDivision of Healthcare Research, National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Mi Ah HanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
In Gyu HwangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. oncology@cau.ac.kr.
Jin Won KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. kimjw05@snu.ac.kr.
Jee Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare RS-2023-CC138503National Cancer Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Korean Cancer Association's clinical practice guidelines for geriatric oncology provide an evidence-based, multidisciplinary framework to optimize cancer care for the growing population of older adults. Geriatric assessment (GA) identifies multidimensional vulnerabilities often missed by standard performance measures, providing critical information to guide individualized treatment planning. This guideline recommends using validated geriatric screening tools, life expectancy prediction models, and toxicity risk calculators to support risk stratification and decision-making. By integrating GA-based multidisciplinary interventions and shared decision-making into clinical practice, clinicians can avoid both overtreatment and undertreatment, reduce treatment-related toxicity, and potentially enhance quality of life. Although the certainty of evidence for most recommendations ranged from very low to low, the panel reached a consensus to provide conditional recommendations. This decision reflects the judgment that the clinical benefits-specifically in reducing treatment-related toxicity and identifying vulnerabilities-outweigh the limitations of current evidence, addressing the urgent need for standardized geriatric care in Korea. Ultimately, these guidelines aim to support individualized, patient-centered care and serve as a practical foundation for clinical and educational applications within the Korean healthcare system.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentGeriatricsMedical OncologyNeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of LifeRepublic of KoreaGeriatric assessmentGeriatricsPatient care team

Identifiers

PMID41713030
PMCPMC13680080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.