SynthesisJMIR infodemiology2026
The Impact of Social Media Videos on Quantitative Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social media has transformed the landscape of health communication. Video content can optimally activate our cognitive systems, enhance learning, and deliver accessible information. Evidence has suggested the positive impact of videos on health knowledge and health-related behaviors, yet the impact of social media videos on quantitative health outcomes is underresearched. Evaluating such outcomes poses unique challenges in measuring exposure and outcomes within internet-based populations. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of social media videos on quantitative health outcomes, examine methodologies used to measure these effects, and describe the characteristics of video interventions and their delivery. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were eligible if they were original research evaluating long-form social media video interventions addressing any health-related condition, delivered via social media platforms, and reported quantitative health outcomes. The primary outcome was the effect of social media videos on quantitative health outcomes. Additional outcomes included participant characteristics, video features, delivery methods, and the use of theoretical frameworks. A narrative synthesis was conducted. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed to synthesize health outcomes mentioned in 2 or more studies with sufficient homogeneity. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, ROBINS-I, or National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool, depending on the study design. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts. Two reviewers independently conducted full-text screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Results: A systematic search was conducted on October 25, 2023, and was updated on June 12, 2025, yielding a total of 41,172 records after duplicate removal. Sixteen studies were included, involving 4158 participants. Mental health-related conditions were the most studied (10 studies). Most video interventions were delivered via YouTube (12 studies). Studies have reported that video interventions were associated with significant improvements in peri-procedural anxiety, mood, and physical activity levels, although most findings were limited to individual studies with variable methodological quality. Three studies that developed videos with user input and theoretical frameworks significantly impacted study-specific primary outcomes. A subgroup meta-analysis demonstrated a significant moderate impact of online video interventions in improving peri-procedural anxiety (standard mean difference=0.57, 95% CI 0.09-1.05). All but one study showed some concern or high risk of bias. Conclusions: We demonstrated a potential positive impact of social media videos on quantitative health outcomes, notably in improving peri-procedural anxiety. Videos developed with user input and theoretical frameworks significantly impacted study-specific primary outcomes. Nevertheless, there is the need to shift focus toward measuring physical health-related outcomes and to develop better designed, innovative methodologies to measure the impact that can better simulate the social media environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.