ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026
Collective RNAP Dynamics Link Transcriptional Strength to Fidelity.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcription fidelity is inherently coupled to its strength, and highly expressed genes often exhibit elevated error rates. Epigenetic and structural factors, including histone modifications, DNA methylation, and nucleoid-associated proteins, modulate transcriptional output and, consequently, fidelity. However, the mechanistic origin of this fidelity-strength relationship remains poorly understood. Here, we propose that repulsive interactions among cotranscribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) might explain these couplings. We develop a stochastic kinetic model of transcription elongation that incorporates both kinetic proofreading and repulsive forces generated through collisions between the neighboring RNAPs. In this framework, it is found that the collision forces accelerate leading RNAPs' elongation speed and impede their kinetic proofreading; the opposite trends occur for the trailing enzymes. As a result, interactions among multiple RNAPs at high initiation rates substantially elevate transcriptional error relative to isolated enzymes, with the magnitude of this increase determined by the intrinsic proofreading rate. In contrast, the mechanical partitioning of force between forward translocation and backtracking pathways primarily modulates elongation speed without altering fidelity. Together, our study provides a quantitative and mechanistic framework that links the collective dynamics of RNAPs to transcriptional errors, offering new physical insights into how transcriptional strength intrinsically compromises fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.