Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712859›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026

Collective RNAP Dynamics Link Transcriptional Strength to Fidelity.

Tripti Midha, Anatoly B Kolomeisky, Oleg A Igoshin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tripti MidhaCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.
Anatoly B KolomeiskyCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5677-6690
Oleg A IgoshinCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1449-4772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription fidelity is inherently coupled to its strength, and highly expressed genes often exhibit elevated error rates. Epigenetic and structural factors, including histone modifications, DNA methylation, and nucleoid-associated proteins, modulate transcriptional output and, consequently, fidelity. However, the mechanistic origin of this fidelity-strength relationship remains poorly understood. Here, we propose that repulsive interactions among cotranscribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) might explain these couplings. We develop a stochastic kinetic model of transcription elongation that incorporates both kinetic proofreading and repulsive forces generated through collisions between the neighboring RNAPs. In this framework, it is found that the collision forces accelerate leading RNAPs' elongation speed and impede their kinetic proofreading; the opposite trends occur for the trailing enzymes. As a result, interactions among multiple RNAPs at high initiation rates substantially elevate transcriptional error relative to isolated enzymes, with the magnitude of this increase determined by the intrinsic proofreading rate. In contrast, the mechanical partitioning of force between forward translocation and backtracking pathways primarily modulates elongation speed without altering fidelity. Together, our study provides a quantitative and mechanistic framework that links the collective dynamics of RNAPs to transcriptional errors, offering new physical insights into how transcriptional strength intrinsically compromises fidelity.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesTranscription, GeneticKineticsStochastic ProcessesDNA-Directed RNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID41712859
PMCPMC12969363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.