Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2026
Screening for Clinically Significant Nephrolithiasis Based on Simple Health Checkup Clinical and Urine Parameters in General Populations: Multicenter Machine Learning Study.
Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nephrolithiasis affects approximately 15% of the population and often remains undetected in asymptomatic individuals. Current diagnostic approaches rely on imaging tools, such as ultrasound or computed tomography, which are costly, operator dependent, or involve radiation, making them unsuitable for large-scale screening. A standardized, practical, and low-cost screening strategy for early identification of clinically significant kidney stones is still lacking. Objective: This study aimed to develop a low-cost, rapid screening model for clinically significant nephrolithiasis using machine learning (ML) and simple clinical parameters. Methods: We conducted a multihospital retrospective study using data from 3 hospitals in Kaohsiung, Taiwan (2012-2021). Adults without renal colic were included. ML models were trained and tested using 10 routine variables: sex, age, BMI, gout, diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine pH, red blood cell count, specific gravity, and bacteriuria. Multiple ML algorithms were trained and evaluated, and the best-performing model was selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the precision-recall curve. To assess model interpretability, Shapley value analysis was performed to determine the relative importance and contribution of each variable to the model's predictive performance. Results: Among 6528 participants, the best-performing model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.968 (95% CI 0.956-0.980), an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.936 (95% CI 0.918-0.953), a sensitivity of 0.873 (95% CI 0.841-0.904), and a specificity of 0.947 (95% CI 0.935-0.959). Shapley value analysis identified urine red blood cell count, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urine specific gravity as the 3 most influential predictors. Conclusions: This ML-based model enables efficient, noninvasive, and large-scale kidney stone screening using routine health data. It can be integrated into health checkups or telemedicine platforms to facilitate early detection and proactive management. Although the model was developed using an Asian population, future validation in diverse cohorts is warranted to confirm its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.