ArticleJMIR AI2026
AI-Generated Images of Substance Use and Recovery: Mixed Methods Case Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Images created with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used for health communication due to their ease of use, speed, accessibility, and low cost. However, AI-generated images may bring practical and ethical risks to health practitioners and the public, including through the perpetuation of stigma against vulnerable and historically marginalized groups. Objective: To understand the potential value of AI-generated images for health care and public health communication, we sought to analyze images of substance use disorder and recovery generated with ChatGPT. Specifically, we sought to investigate: (1) the default visual outputs produced in response to a range of prompts about substance use disorder and recovery, and (2) the extent to which prompt modification and guideline-informed prompting could mitigate potentially stigmatizing imagery. Methods: We performed a mixed-methods case study examining depictions of substance use and recovery in images generated by ChatGPT 4.o. We generated images (n=84) using (1) prompts with colloquial and stigmatizing language, (2) prompts that follow best practices for person-first language, (3) image prompts written by ChatGPT, and (4) a custom GPT informed by guidelines for images of SUD. We then used a mixed-methods approach to analyze images for demographics and stigmatizing elements. Results: Images produced in the default ChatGPT model featured primarily White men (81%, n=34). Further, images tended to be stigmatizing, featuring injection drug use, dark colors, and symbolic elements such as chains. These trends persisted even when person-first language prompts were used. Images produced by the guideline-informed custom GPT were markedly less stigmatizing; however, they featured almost only Black women (74%, n=31). Conclusions: Our findings confirm prior research about stigma and biases in AI-generated images and extend this literature to substance use. However, our findings also suggest that (1) images can be improved when clear guidelines are provided and (2) even with guidelines, iteration is needed to create an image that fully concords with best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.