ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Video-Based Motion Capture Smartphone Apps for Testing Human Motor Performance Skills: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- StaBLE: digital metrics capture balance performance across a wide spectrum of balance tasks and abilities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mobile Health (mHealth) Apps in Sport Training: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Video-Based Motion Capture Smartphone Apps for Testing Human Motor Performance Skills: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Good motor performance skills (MPS) are relevant in all stages of life. Higher MPS are associated with enhanced cognitive abilities and physical and mental health. The assessment of MPS is important to identify deficits in MPS at an early stage and to implement interventions to address these deficits. One method to assess MPS is through marker-based motion capture in a laboratory setting with multiple cameras. However, this approach is expensive and time-consuming, making it impractical, for example, in large-scale studies for MPS assessment. Recent advancements (eg, artificial intelligence) in technology (eg, smartphone cameras) have opened up innovative solutions for various challenges (eg, testing large sample sizes). A potential solution is using video-based smartphone apps to assess MPS through markerless motion capture with a single camera. Objective: The objectives of this scoping review were to summarize existing smartphone apps designed to digitally assess MPS through motion capture, identify the target population of the apps, determine whether the apps have been validated, and summarize the specific MPS that were assessed. Methods: The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The search was conducted in March 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Education Resources Information Centre, and SAGE Publications. All included studies investigated video-based motion capture smartphone apps to assess MPS. Results: A total of 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven different smartphone apps were used within the studies, 6 of which have already been validated. The MPS assessed through the apps were gait, breaststroke, running, countermovement jump, and shoulder mobility, and 1 study assessed a functional movement test battery. The studied populations were healthy adults, older adults, athletes, or individuals with neurological illnesses. Conclusions: The assessment of MPS through smartphone apps represents a promising tool, which can be used in a variety of fields, such as health and performance monitoring, coaching, and scientific research. In the future, more studies should focus on developing new smartphone apps to assess different MPS and validate these apps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.