Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712770›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

In Vitro Comparison of the Dimensional Accuracy of Implant Impressions Using Custom Acrylic Trays and Prefabricated Self-Perforating Trays: Protocol for a Comparative Evaluation Study.

Arti Agrawal, Sharayu Nimonkar, Surekha Godbole, Rushabh Parakh, Vikram Belkhode, Namita Zilpilwar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arti AgrawalDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, 202, SPDC building, DMIHER, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India, 91 7057088288.ORCID 0009-0005-1070-4153
Sharayu NimonkarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, 202, SPDC building, DMIHER, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India, 91 7057088288.ORCID 0000-0002-1188-7300
Surekha GodboleDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, 202, SPDC building, DMIHER, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India, 91 7057088288.ORCID 0000-0002-3642-9787
Rushabh ParakhBharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0000-4360-8057
Vikram BelkhodeDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, 202, SPDC building, DMIHER, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India, 91 7057088288.ORCID 0000-0002-8667-5011
Namita ZilpilwarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, 202, SPDC building, DMIHER, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, 442001, India, 91 7057088288.ORCID 0009-0000-7046-8942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The accurate transfer of implant positions from the patient's mouth to the laboratory is crucial for the successful fabrication of prostheses in implant-based prosthodontics. Making an implant impression is a crucial part of this procedure as it replicates the intraoral implant position and transfers it to the cast to be used in the laboratory for fabricating a passive fit prosthesis. The purpose of this study is to compare and assess the accuracy of implant impressions made with prefabricated self-perforating trays and custom acrylic trays. Objective: The primary objective is to compare the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions made using custom acrylic trays versus prefabricated self-perforating trays in an in vitro setting. The secondary objective is to determine whether the impressions made with prefabricated self-perforating trays achieve clinically acceptable accuracy. Methods: A partially edentulous mandibular model with implants placed at the second premolar and first molar region will function as a master model. Impressions will be made using the custom acrylic tray and prefabricated self-perforating implant impression tray. The cast obtained will be scanned, and an STL file will be generated to evaluate the accuracy of implant positions using HyperMesh software. Statistical analysis will be done with IBM SPSS Statistics at a 95% CI and 80% power. Results: The study aims to evaluate whether there is a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant casts obtained using prefabricated self-perforating trays versus custom acrylic trays. As of July 2025, the models have been prepared for further analysis. It is projected that data collection will be completed in May 2026, with results to be published in early 2027. Conclusions: For the success of implant dentistry, the precise fit of the final prosthesis has become a necessity. A mismatched framework may overload the implant, endangering its durability. To achieve a precise fit of the implant framework, a precise definitive cast is necessary, which depends on several factors, one of them being the implant impression tray selection. Traditionally, custom acrylic trays have been used. However, they are impractical to use in routine clinical practice due to certain disadvantages. A newer range of trays for the open tray impression technique is being marketed, and one would be able to reduce the additional expense and laboratory time associated with using custom acrylic trays by using this newer variety of self-perforating implant impression tray.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Impression TechniqueDental Prosthesis DesignDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMandibleModels, DentalDental Implantscustom-made traysdentistrydimensional accuracyimplant impressionsprefabricated traysprosthodontics

Identifiers

PMID41712770
PMCPMC12919740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.