Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712666›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

On the Gaussian distribution of the Mann-Kendall tau in the case of autocorrelated data.

Tristan Gamot, Nils Thibeau-Sutre, Tom J M Van Dooren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tristan GamotSorbonne Université (SU), Université Paris Cité (UPC), Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris, IEES Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9681-6081
Nils Thibeau-SutreSorbonne Université (SU), Université Paris Cité (UPC), Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris, IEES Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5903-5300
Tom J M Van DoorenSorbonne Université (SU), Université Paris Cité (UPC), Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris, IEES Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-parametric Mann-Kendall tests for autocorrelated data rely on the assumption that the distribution of the normalized Mann-Kendall tau is Gaussian. While this assumption holds asymptotically for stationary autoregressive processes of order 1 (AR(1)) and simple moving average (SMA) processes when sampling over an increasingly long period, it often fails for finite-length time series. In such cases, the empirical distribution of the Mann-Kendall tau deviates significantly from the Gaussian distribution. To assess the validity of this assumption, we explore an alternative asymptotic framework for AR(1) and SMA processes. We prove that, along upsampling sequences, the distribution of the normalized Mann-Kendall tau does not converge to a Gaussian but instead to a bounded distribution with strictly positive variance. This asymptotic behavior suggests scaling laws which determine the conditions under which the Gaussian approximation remains valid for finite-length time series generated by stationary AR(1) and SMA processes. Using Shapiro-Wilk tests, we numerically confirm the departure from normality and establish simple, practical criteria for assessing the validity of the Gaussian assumption, which depend on both the autocorrelation structure and the series length. Finally, we illustrate these findings with examples from existing studies.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID41712666
PMCPMC12919832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.