Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Knowledge flows from science to AI technology: Identifying core and brokerage technological roles.

Seokhui Lee, Jisoo Hur, Junseok Hwang, Dieter F Kogler, Keungoui Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seokhui LeeTechnology Management, Economics and Policy Program, College of Engineering/ Integrated Major in Smart City Global Convergence, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3094-3082
Jisoo HurDr. Theo Schöller Chair of Technology and Innovation Management, TUM School of Management, Munchen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1031-8036
Junseok HwangTechnology Management, Economics and Policy Program, College of Engineering/ Integrated Major in Smart City Global Convergence, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dieter F KoglerSpatial Dynamics Lab, Regional and Urban Planning Richview Campus, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6744-5632
Keungoui KimHumanities, Arts, and Social Sciences Division (HASSD), Underwood International College, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-8813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has not only driven convergence with diverse technological domains but also swiftly spread across various industrial sectors. As a knowledge-intensive field, AI is particularly shaped by the flow of knowledge from scientific research to technological development, yet remains insufficiently examined in a systematic and structural way. This study addresses this gap by investigating science-to-technology knowledge flow that underpins AI's technological evolution. We propose a semantic science-technology exploration framework specifically designed for the AI domain, consisting of the two stages: technology classification and semantic topic exploration. First, AI patents are classified into four categories using centrality measures derived from a CPC co-occurrence network. Then, we extract abstracts from both patents and their cited scientific publications to apply BERTopic modelling and generate topic labels using generative AI. Analyzing AI-related patents filed from 2002 to 2021, we trace key technological trends and elucidate the structural pathways of knowledge flow science to technology. The findings offer practical implications for corporate R&D strategies and innovation policy design in the era of AI.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKnowledgeScienceTechnologyGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansPatents as TopicSemantics

Identifiers

PMID41712617
PMCPMC12919798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.