ArticlePloS one2026
Socioeconomic determinants of virtual care use among people living with HIV in a clinical cohort in Ontario, Canada: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetention in HIV care is essential for achieving optimal health outcomes and extending life expectancy among people living with HIV. However, socioeconomic challenges frequently hinder consistent engagement in care. Virtual care offers a potential solution by enhancing timely access to HIV services and addressing these barriers.
objectivesWe aimed to examine the association between socioeconomic factors and the use of virtual care among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in a clinical cohort in Ontario, Canada.
methodsWe analyzed 2022 data from the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study (OCS), coinciding with the initial rollout of virtual care. The OCS is a multi-site cohort comprising patients from 15 HIV clinics, with data obtained from medical charts, interviews, and linkage to provincial public health lab (PHOL) records for viral load testing. We employed multinomial logistic regression to identify predictors of care mode: virtual, in-person, or a hybrid (virtual and in-person).
resultsThe study included 1,930 participants. Of these, 19% (n = 367) received virtual care, 45.6% (n = 900) received in-person care, and 34.3% (n = 663) accessed hybrid care services. The median participant age was 55 years [Q1; Q3: 45; 62], and 78% (n = 1,131) identified as men who have sex with men (MSM). Compared to Toronto residents, individuals living in Southwestern Ontario had higher odds of using virtual care (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.67, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.47). Conversely, females (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.88), heterosexual men (AOR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.92), residents of Eastern Ontario (AOR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.26, 0.68), individuals with a high school education (AOR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.98), those with an annual gross income of CAD $71,000-90,000 (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.91), and individuals diagnosed with HIV within the last 10 years (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39, 0.91) were less likely to use virtual care. Participants experiencing any level of depression were more likely to use hybrid care services.
conclusionVirtual care was introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance healthcare access in Ontario. Its adoption varied based on socioeconomic and health-related factors in the OCS cohort. Ongoing research is needed to assess these patterns beyond the pandemic context..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.