Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The effect of patient experience with nurses and ward type on intention to recommend: Focusing on integrated nursing and caring service wards and general wards, 2020-2022.

Jinsun Kim, Seungju Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinsun KimDepartment of Health System, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7163-5491
Seungju KimDepartment of Health System, College of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-3802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to compared inpatients' intention to recommend hospitals between integrated nursing and caring service wards (INCSW) and general wards (GW), and examined between patients' experiences with nurses and recommendation intention.

methodsThis study analyzed 943 inpatients (INCSW = 223, GW = 720) using the Korea Medical Service Experience Survey (2020-2022). Intention to recommend and nurse experience were measured on 5-point Likert scales and treated as approximately continuous, a common approach that supports the use of multivariable linear regression. Ward differences were assessed using t-tests, and effect sizes were summarized using Cohen's d.

resultsPatients in INCSW reported higher recommendation intention than those in GW (Mean 4.11 vs 3.98), with a small effect size (Cohen's d = 0.27). However, ward type was not independently associated with recommendation intention in the fully adjusted model. All nurse experience domains were positively associated with recommendation intention, with courtesy showing the largest coefficient (β = 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.37).

conclusionAlthough recommendation intention was slightly higher among INCSW patients in unadjusted comparisons, ward type was not independently associated with willingness to recommend after adjustment. In contrast, all nurse experience domains were positively and significantly associated with patients' willingness to recommend the hospital. Strengthening nurse communication competencies, supported by ward-level monitoring and feedback-based training, may enhance patient experience and willingness to recommend.

Indexed as

InpatientsNurse-Patient RelationsNursing Staff, HospitalPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41712594
PMCPMC12919837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.