ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
PAIRNet: Predicting PIWI cleavage specificity via position-aware RNA interaction modeling.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PIWI proteins maintain genome integrity by piRNA-guided cleavage of complementary RNA targets. While Cleave-N'-Seq (CNS-seq) has advanced our understanding of PIWI targeting logic through quantitative mapping of cleavage rates and pairing rules, its labor-intensive workflows hinder systematic exploration of sequence determinants. Here, we present PAIRNet, a deep learning framework that predicts PIWI-mediated RNA cleavage rates by explicitly modeling guide-target interactions. Recognizing that interaction geometry, not just sequence, dictates cleavage efficiency, PAIRNet integrates biochemical insights with computational innovation: it encodes pairing states, mismatch types, insertions, and deletions alongside learnable positional embeddings to quantify spatial dependencies; employs a hybrid CNN-Transformer architecture prioritizing duplex dynamics over static sequence features to resolve both local catalytic motifs (e.g., contiguous base-pairing at g10-g11) and distal structural perturbations; and incorporates interpretability modules (saliency maps, counterfactual analysis) to link interaction patterns to biochemical insights and uncover position-specific cleavage rules. Validated across four PIWI-guide datasets, PAIRNet consistently ranks among the top two performers in all experimental conditions, achieving the most pronounced relative improvements in PCC, 34.7% for MILI and 14.6% for MIWI, over second-ranking methods. Critically, PAIRNet recapitulates key biological principles-stringent complementarity at catalytic residues (g10-g11) and tolerance for 3' mismatches-aligning with structural studies of PIWI dynamics. By bridging biochemical precision with computational scalability, PAIRNet establishes a roadmap for designing high-specificity piRNA silencing tools while accelerating mechanistic studies of RNA-guided genome defense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.