ArticlePloS one2026
Early psychometric characteristics of the NUrsing Behavioral Engagement (NuBE) Scale in cancer settings: A three-phases validation study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient engagement in cancer care is increasingly recognized as essential for improving clinical outcomes. Nurses play a crucial role in fostering patient engagement, yet there is a lack of validated instruments to assess which nursing behaviors are most effective in promoting engagement from the patient's perspective.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and test the psychometric characteristics of the Nurses' Behavioral Engagement Scale, a tool designed to measure nursing behaviors that support patient engagement in oncology settings, from patients' point of view.
methodsThe study followed a three-phase exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. In the first phase, 53 items were generated based on findings from a previous qualitative study and a systematic review of the literature. In the second phase, the items underwent content validation through a modified e-Delphi procedure with 19 experts in oncology nursing, patient engagement, tool development, and linguistics. Forty-eight items were deemed relevant and tested in the third phase with a sample of 250 cancer patients to evaluate construct validity, internal consistency, and convergent validity.
resultsExploratory Factor Analysis revealed a four-factor structure, collectively explaining 70.0% of the total variance: Factor 1 - Acknowledgment of Patient's Uniqueness, Factor 2 - Meeting Patient's Knowledge Expectations, Factor 3 - Fostering Patient's Motivation, and Factor 4 - Valuing Patient's Informal Caregivers. The final Nurses' Behavioral Engagement Scale comprises 29 items. Internal consistency was excellent, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.953, 0.890, 0.942, and 0.920 for the four factors, respectively. The Nurses' Behavioral Engagement Scale demonstrated significant and meaningful correlations with the Health Care Climate Questionnaire and items assessing satisfaction with nursing care, supporting its convergent validity.
conclusionThe Nurses' Behavioral Engagement Scale provides a psychometrically sound measure of nursing behaviors that promote patient engagement in oncology care. This tool has the potential to inform targeted interventions and quality improvement initiatives, ultimately enhancing patient-centered care and improving health outcomes in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.