Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712564›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Public-private mix in health systems and repercussions for health inequalities in Latin American countries: A scoping review protocol.

Eduarda Ferreira Dos Anjos, Suelen Carlos de Oliveira, Adriana Mendoza-Ruiz, Maria Del Pilar Flores-Quispe, Adelyne Maria Mendes Pereira, Carl Kendall, Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo Kerr, Naiá Ortelan, Elzo Pereira Pinto Junior, Natalia Romero and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eduarda Ferreira Dos AnjosNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4322-236X
Suelen Carlos de OliveiraNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Adriana Mendoza-RuizNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Del Pilar Flores-QuispeCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Adelyne Maria Mendes PereiraNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-9861
Carl KendallSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-4333
Ligia Regina Franco Sansigolo KerrSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Naiá OrtelanCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Elzo Pereira Pinto JuniorCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Natalia RomeroUniversidad Internacional del Ecuador (UIDE), Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
Alastair LeylandMRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Mauricio Lima BarretoCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
Cristiani Vieira MachadoNational School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Unit on the Social and, Environmental Determinants of Health Inequalities (SEDHI)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth system models in Latin American countries express differences in the state's role in regulating, financing and providing health services, as well as in the coexistence of different care arrangements involving public and private entities. This scoping review will seek to identify evidence on how the different public-private configurations of health systems influence health inequalities in Latin America. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol will be guided by the scoping review methodology developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The results will be presented according to the PRISMA-ScR protocol. Searches will be carried out on the Scielo, Lilacs, Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. The inclusion criteria will be publications whose central theme is the public-private mix of health systems in Latin America between January 2000 and March 2024. Exclusion criteria will be clinical trials, incomplete studies or in the design phase, duplicate publications, pre-print studies and gray literature (interim reports, unpublished texts, dissertations, and theses. The steps for carrying out the scope review will: (1) identifying the research question; (2) identifying relevant studies; (3) study selection; (4) charting the data; and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. Two independent reviewers will select the articles. The results will be described, analyzed, and categorized through narrative synthesis, correlating with the research objectives and questions. EXPECTED

resultsIt is hoped that this scoping protocol will provide a comprehensive framework for investigating the gaps in the current literature on the public-private mix in Latin America and the effects on health inequalities. Link to the protocol record in the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/rkzx3/?view_only=4594a2c52f2d47128d805fdd9dd1359b.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealthcare DisparitiesPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsHumansLatin AmericaScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41712564
PMCPMC12919785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.