Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Higher education student engagement in learning activities: Clarifying concepts and introducing a short-scale.

Feliciano Veiga, Johnmarshall Reeve, Carlota M Veiga, Zi Yang Wong, Isabel Martínez, Nuno Archer de Carvalho, Anabela Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Feliciano VeigaUnidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação, Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Educação, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-6238
Johnmarshall ReeveInstitute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Australia.
Carlota M VeigaCentro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.
Zi Yang WongNational Institute of Education, Psychology and Child & Human Development Academic, Singapore.
Isabel MartínezDepartamento de Psicología Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-8022
Nuno Archer de CarvalhoUnidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação, Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Educação, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6620-0804
Anabela PereiraUniversidade de Évora, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Student engagement plays a vital role in higher education due to its significant influence on academic outcomes, such as academic achievement and course completion. However, the concept of student engagement is often ambiguously defined, with a lack of distinction between engagement in learning and involvement in the academic community. Although the current student engagement measures have contributed to advancing knowledge in the area, they are often too long and exclude agentic engagement, which is seen as a key dimension in higher education. This research aimed to (a) clarify the concept of student engagement and the conceptual problems of the existing scales and (b) develop and validate a short, robust scale for measuring student engagement in learning activities, including agentic engagement. We conducted three studies with Portuguese higher education students: Study 1 developed the Higher Education Student Engagement in Learning Activities - a Short Scale, using exploratory factor analysis to assess cognitive, affective, behavioral, and agentic dimensions. Study 2 and Study 3, with different samples, evaluated the reliability and validity of the developed scale through confirmatory factor analysis. The results highlight the importance of a four-dimensional conceptual approach to student engagement and provide a validated framework for its measurement. This short scale clarifies the distinction between engagement in learning and in the academic community, and introduces agentic engagement as a key dimension. It offers a valuable tool for assessing student engagement in higher education, with implications for enhancing academic practices and outcomes.

Indexed as

LearningStudentsAcademiaAcademic SuccessFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID41712563
PMCPMC12919811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.