ArticlePLoS biology2026
Metabolic modeling reveals determinants of prebiotic and probiotic treatment efficacy across multiple human intervention trials.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial diversity: the essential foundation for life on our planet.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Systems engineering of engineered live biotherapeutics: A discovery-to-translation framework for streamlining microbiome therapeutic development.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026Review
- Natural Products as Nutritional Supplements in Human Disease Prevention and Management: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Probiotic Bacteria in Stimulating Human Physiological Responses: Metabolic Function and Overall Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Precision prebiotics: Engineering food-derived polysaccharides to target specific SCFA-producing taxa for neuroprotection via the microbiota-gut-brain axis.Current research in food science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prebiotic, probiotic, and combined (synbiotic) interventions often show variable outcomes across individuals, driven by complex interactions between introduced biotics, the endogenous microbiota, and the host diet. Predicting individual-specific success or failure of probiotic and prebiotic therapies remains a major challenge. Here, we leverage microbial community-scale metabolic models (MCMMs) to predict probiotic engraftment and microbiota-mediated short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production in response to probiotic and prebiotic interventions. Using data from two human clinical trial cohorts, testing a five-strain probiotic combined with the prebiotic inulin designed to improve metabolic health and an eight-strain probiotic designed to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections, respectively, we show that MCMM-predicted engraftment largely agrees with measurements, achieving 75%-80% accuracy. Engraftment probabilities varied across taxa. MCMMs captured treatment-driven shifts in predicted SCFA production, and higher model-predicted growth rates of Akkermansia muciniphila were negatively associated with glucose area under the curve (AUC) in the first trial, providing clues about the mechanisms underlying treatment efficacy. Extending these models to a third human cohort undergoing a healthy diet and lifestyle intervention revealed substantial inter-individual variability in predicted responses to increasing dietary fiber, which were significantly associated with baseline-to-follow-up changes in cardiometabolic health markers. Finally, our simulation results suggested that personalized prebiotic selection may further enhance probiotic efficacy. Together, these findings demonstrate the potential of metabolic modeling to guide personalized microbiome-mediated interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.