Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41712219›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2026

Treatment for Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiation vs Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Ayal A Aizer, Kee-Young Shin, Paul J Catalano, Ivy Ricca, Marciana Johnson, Grant Benham, Kristin Roper, Beverly Spicer, Eileen Mann, Jennifer Nosker and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03075072 (Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiation Versus Stereotactic Radiation), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03075072 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Hippocampal Sparing Whole Brain Radiation Versus Stereotactic Radiation (SRS) in Patients With 5-20 Brain Metastases: A Phase III, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorDana-Farber Cancer InstituteRan2017 to 2025Enrolled196ConditionsBrain MetastasesArmsWhole brain radiation, Stereotactic radiation (SRS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Ayal A AizerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kee-Young ShinDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Paul J CatalanoDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ivy RiccaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marciana JohnsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Grant BenhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kristin RoperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, Massachusetts.
Beverly SpicerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eileen MannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer NoskerDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael W ParsonsDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Mallika L MenduPopulation Health Services Organization, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jaroslaw HepelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence.
Fallon ChipidzaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, Massachusetts.
Monica KrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, Massachusetts.
Diana D ShiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nayan LambaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Itai PashtanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, Massachusetts.
Luke PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Milford Regional Medical Center, Milford, Massachusetts.
Brian AlexanderValo Health, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daphne A Haas-KoganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rifaquat RahmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shyam TanguturiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Brain metastases are common in patients with cancer, and radiation is often used for management. Among patients with more than 4 brain metastases, the effects of stereotactic radiation targeting only individual tumors, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, which radiates both tumors and normal brain, remain unknown. Objective: To determine whether stereotactic radiation improves symptom severity and interference with daily functioning, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 United States-based centers. Eligible patients had 5 to 20 brain metastases and no prior brain-directed radiation. Enrollment occurred between April 11, 2017, and May 17, 2024 (final follow-up, March 18, 2025). Intervention: Stereotactic radiation, compared with whole brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean weighted patient-reported symptom severity and interference score change over 6 months postbaseline relative to baseline using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor instrument (scale, 0-10; score change range, -10 to 10; -10 = best). A clinically meaningful Δ was defined as 0.98. Results: Of 196 randomized patients (mean age, 61 years; 129 [66%] female; 176 [90%] White; median number of brain metastases, 14 [IQR, 11-18]; 49 [25%] with prior neurosurgical resection), 83 (42%) completed the 6-month assessment. For the primary outcome, between baseline and postbaseline assessments through the 6-month follow-up, stereotactic radiation changed the weighted composite MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor score from 2.69 to 2.37 (mean change, -0.32) and hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation changed the score from 2.29 to 3.03 (mean change, 0.74) (mean difference, -1.06 [95% CI, -1.54 to -0.58]; P < .001). Related grade 3-5 adverse events occurred in 12 patients (12%) in the stereotactic radiation group and 13 patients (13%) in the hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation group; grade 1-3 fatigue was most frequent (27 [28%] vs 43 [44%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with 5 to 20 brain metastases, these findings support stereotactic radiation over hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation to improve symptoms and interference with daily functioning, key components of quality of life. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03075072.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCranial IrradiationHippocampusOrgan Sparing TreatmentsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryActivities of Daily LivingAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID41712219
PMCPMC12921566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.